TE 801 Math
Monday, October 4, 2010
Seminar 4 Blog Post: Reading Summaries
This chapter walks us through how to plan effective lessons. Such lesson plans include: identifying the mathematical goals, anticipating confusion, asking questions, and planning the implementation. It describes the importance of using discussion (and different talk formats) to teach mathematical concepts and being open to altering your lesson to respond to what students know or don’t know. To conclude the lesson, summarizing what occurred in the lesson is important in order to solidify students’ understanding.
Stein, M. K. (2001) Mathematical argumentation: Putting the umph into classroom discussion. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 7(2), 110‐112.
This article describes a real life example of classroom discussion used in a middle school mathematics class. Providing a more open-ended problem allowed individual students to determine the solution method that worked best for them. Then, the teacher facilitated a whole-class discussion in which the correct solution and a common incorrect solution were both presented. It was up to the students to present their arguments, defend their methods, and then decide which is correct. Overall, the teacher used classroom discussion to let students inquire about math.
Atkins, S. (1999, January). Listening to students: The power of mathematical conversations. Teaching Children Mathematics, 289‐295.
This article discussed a classroom in which the teacher is not the sole source of knowledge. Students can teach each other and learn from one another as well. It focused on the importance of using classroom discussion and student-led mathematical conversation as a tool to promote higher-level thinking in our students.
Kazemi, E. (1998, March). Discourse that promotes conceptual understanding. Teaching Children Mathematics, 410‐414
This article talks about ways to promote deeper-level thinking among our students (we must find a happy medium between rote memorization and fun exploration). Again, students were given a problem that allowed the possibility of several open-ended solution methods. After working in groups to solve the problem, each came up with a different strategy and could present and justify it to the class. Then, students could “practice articulating their thinking” by discussing and exploring correct and incorrect solutions (p. 413).
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Article Summaries
Chapin, O’Connor, Anderson. (2009). Chapter 9: Planning Lessons – The chapter about lesson plans really lays out the lesson plan that Chapin, O’Connor, and Anderson feel is most effective. The lesson plan that they use has five components, these components are, identifying the mathematical goals, anticipating confusion, asking questions, managing classroom talk, and planning the implementation. This lesson plan focus’ highly on using talk to learn mathematical and how important it is to think about the mathematics prior to teaching the lesson. This in-turn will help keep the focus of the discussion on the students’ understanding and helps the talk move forward so the goals of the lesson are addressed.
Stein, M.K. (2001). Mathematical Argumentation: Putting the Umph into Classroom Discussion – Centering your classroom discussion on mathematical tasks does not have to become a routine, or how Stein puts it, “the IRE routine (teacher initiation, student reply, teacher evaluation)” (Stein, page 110). Instead, as the teacher you can step back and let the students do all the thinking and discussing. The teacher’s role then becomes to simply encourage risk taking and alignment with one position or the other in the debate, or to just be there to revoice and clarify student discussion.
Atkins, S. (1999). Listening to Students: The Power of Mathematical Conversations – This article focuses on the importance of the teacher taking a step back and allowing the students to do more of the talking as well as leading classroom discussions. When the teacher steps back and becomes a member rather than the leader, it opens up more relationship building between the students where they are being challenged and reconstructing each other’s ideas.
Kazemi, E (1998). Discourse that Promotes Conceptual Understanding – In Kazemi’s article, the point that is being made is what it means to “press” students to think conceptually about math. It is important that teachers help students build on their thinking so that their problem solving and conceptual understanding can increase. Kazemi also states in this article the importance of students make use of reasoning that justifies procedures rather than statements of the procedures themselves (Kazemi, page 410).
Saturday, October 2, 2010
Seminar 4 Posting- Main Points of 4 Articles
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Seminar 3 Blog Posting
Seminar 3 Blog Post
This quote really resonated with me for two different reasons. First, throughout my entire education (from elementary school through college) I can remember being able to put my peers in this academic status order. When my teachers placed students in groups, I can remember thinking “Oh no, I’m with him…that means I’m going to have to do everything.” Second, I found this quote to be so fascinating because I’ve already noticed students in my first grade classroom ranking each other in an academic status order. Specifically, we have books placed in leveled bins (red, green, orange, yellow) which vary in difficulty. The other day I heard one student who was picking books from the green bin tease a student picking books from the red bin, saying “Look how easy those are. Those are baby books!” So already, at 5 and 6 years old, students are beginning to compare and rank themselves academically among their peers. Overall, this academic status order is an unfortunate and real part of our classrooms. It especially comes into play when working in groups, as the perceived “expert” in the group will likely influence and dominate over the entire group (Cohen, 29). To combat this, I like the idea of assigning particular roles for each group member (i.e. recorder-responsible for writing, reporter- shares to class, etc.) to ensure that every student has the opportunity to participate! Overall, now that I am aware of the academic status order which is already developing in my classroom, I can talk with my mentor teacher about ways to address it and ultimately limit its impact.
Cohen Readings - Favorite Quote
Explanation: This quote was interesting to me first and foremost because I had never heard of the multiple ability treatment and I found it very fascinating. The multiple ability treatment consisted of explaining the different abilities necessary for a survival task of Lost on the Moon before groups began their discussions (page 123). This strategy was created so that individuals would be shown equal status behaviors as opposed to exhibiting a pattern of dominance by the high-ability students. Therefore this quote intrigued me to want to see this treatment be put into action. I feel that in our first grade classroom, if we made use of the multiple ability strategy the students would understand from the start how each individual student is equal and everyone has their own strengths and abilities. I also feel that at this age, this is a good way to introduce the students to treating everyone equal and not as superiors or inferiors, right from the start. This in-turn can help with self-esteem and confidence later in life.